Amix of social, environmental, occupational, and economic factors collectively labelled the social determinants of health (SDOH) have a greater combined influence on the morbidity and mortality of our patients that the services we deliver in traditional medical care. Addressing SDOH can prevent illness and unnecessary services and produce better health. And yet, U.S. health care payments do not typically adjust fo these factors to support related needs and services and do not support told, teams or delivery redesign needed to adequately address SDOH. Therefore, health plans that serve members with disproportionately higher SDOH needs have significantly higher resource demands and require significantly higher reimbursement. The current reimbursement scheme based on Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk adjustment does not take into account SDOH and perpetuates systematic disparities for the most vulnerable patients and the health plans that serve them.
The 2014 IMPACT Act directed the US Secretary of Health & Human Services to review the evidence linking social risk factors with performance under existing federal payment systems and to suggest policy options. Most US states now require accessing and addressing social determinants in Medicaid contracts but most of these offer insufficient specificity or adjustment tied to accountability. And while there are several research studies and philanthropic demonstrations focused on addressing social determinants, there is little U.S. evidence available on which to build. Other countries, including England, have for decades routinely adjusted payments for health care and social services o account for neighborhood deprivation. These international examples, and related models in the US, have the potential to improve the effectiveness of value-based purchasing and health for the nation. There are several , related small-areaSDOH indices in the US with a growing amount of evidence of their relationships to important health outcomes, avoidable hospitalizations, and disease prevalence. These indices are potential candidates for meaningful and reliable health services payment adjustment and the second letter to Congress in response to the 2014 IMPACT Act acknowledges that area-level rise may be a viable way to adjust resources to providers.